Showing posts with label Value Studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Value Studies. Show all posts

Saturday, April 10, 2021

FOCUS DEMONSTRATION

When you paint or draw an object, you can direct the viewer’s eye to whatever part of the object you want. The building owner may have asked you to highlight one aspect of the project, or the building may have several owners/investors with different goals.


Focus may not matter much when the object is compact, like a face or a small house, but it becomes important when illustrating a sprawling object, such as a long, low building or a tall, thin building. The following illustration of a glass and steel skyscraper is a good example of the problems and opportunities of focus. 

Throughout the process, focus was considered. 

The building was to be located in downtown Tampa, so most of its sides would be closely blocked by other, existing buildings. 




I tried several sketches, including the two above. The aerial view seemed to lose the new building in the crowd of existing buildings. The second view offered a wider range of ways to handle light without obscuring the building entirely. 



So I tried a couple of extra sketches, first a dark building on light background, and second a light building on dark background. Neither sketch was meant to suggest a final solution.



Next I built a computer model, including surrounding buildings and cars. On a print of the view, I added trees and people, and scanned the result.



Just to check my earlier sketches, I repeated my dark-on-light sketch, then added a study that placed a middle-value building between dark foreground buildings and grey background buildings. These are all rather pedestrian; in fact, at this point I was disappointed with the possibilities.

However, the visual properties of glass and steel provide opportunities to play with light and atmosphere and, of course, focus.





The four pastel sketches above try out lighting schemes that shift the focus on the building. At the top is a fairly standard approach emphasizing the building’s vertical unity, while the other three sketches focus on the top, the bottom, and both top and bottom. Any one of these sketches might lead to an interesting rendering, but in the end I just had to develop the last one. The ethereal idea of emphasizing the top and bottom of the building, while “losing” the middle of the shaft, has always fascinated me.


Here is the pastel color study developing that idea. I decided on a scenario after sundown, with artificial lighting providing most of the effect. Therefore you can see a muted reflection of the evening sky in the reflective glass of the top half of the building, and a warm glow of the street lighting at the base. Meanwhile, the steel mullions and interior walls and ceiling reflect the building’s floodlighting at the top and bottom, and interior lighting scatters a counterpoint up the entire shaft.

I felt confident enough in that sketch to go straight to final art. I figured I could do it best in Photoshop, since it has many layers and masks and is adjustable in a range of ways.

I took the final line drawing, which would provide plenty of detail, and began rendering each obvious area on a separate layer. 


First, the building’s vision and spandrel panels (both reflective).


Add the vertical stainless-steel ribs.


And finally, the building’s interior lighting at various floor levels.


Next, the basic blocks of the distant surrounding buildings are colored in various cool shades.


And the overcast sky.


The foreground context buildings take shape.


Finish covering the board with the streets, sidewalks and nearby park.


Bring the surrounding buildings up to reality with interior lighting and lighted signage.

At this point I had a passable rendering: realistic, accurate and dramatic. But hey, this was for my own enjoyment, and I had unlimited time. So I printed out that last image and started working it over in pastel. I changed the sky so the top of the building was obscured by the low clouds. I pushed all the far buildings into a uniform middle value. And I added to and loosened up the street-level light.


I thought the pastel was an improvement in overall impact and abstract composition. The focus was also stronger, although there was now a secondary focus of the light blue sky near the horizon.


So, finally, I pushed into the final in Photoshop. The result was more crisp and less strident but did have a stronger contrast at top and bottom, compared to the pastel. The center of the rendering became more homogeneous, with less contrast between the existing buildings and the sky. Squinting, I see a warm slash at the bottom of the image and a cool cloud at the top. At first glance you might not be sure what you are looking at, but on closer inspection the building comes clear.


...and there is plenty of interesting detail to draw you even closer.

I have addressed focus in a number of blog posts, but I’m going to round up a batch of examples soon.

Monday, August 5, 2019

Inspiration - Schell Lewis


I happened on an old Harvard Magazine (March April 2009) yesterday while sorting out moving boxes in the attic. (No, I’m not Ivy, my son is). It had an article on the Supreme Court with a rendering of the Supreme Court building in Washington. The rendering was by Schell Lewis, an excellent but now forgotten architectural delineator.


It struck a chord with me. First, it was sad that such a talented artist was now completely forgotten. And second, it reminded me that I had gathered images for a blog post on him; a post that was filed away when I found so little biographical information.

Since I’m more interested in the art than the artist, I’ve decided to post what little I’ve got.


According to the 1920 census, Schell Lewis was born about 1887 in Moline, Illinois (I found a site suggesting that he was born in 1875, but that seems improbable). By 1920 he became known for his skill in architectural delineation. He worked in the office of Charles A. Platt for years, but by the late 1920s he was doing professional renderings for other architects. He was active into his 60s, with little evidence of age. The latest image I could find was from 1960.

The following is from Pencil Points magazine, vol. 2, 1921
“Though Mr. Schell Lewis has made many excellent perspective drawings and sketches he has not specialized in rendering… His charcoal drawings, made as a means of studying the designs in the office and not as presentation drawings, convey the character of the designs admirably and are done with great facility.
Mr. Lewis was born in Moline, Ill., but his family removed to New York when he was a youth. After acquiring the rudiments of drafting he entered an architect’s office in New York. Then, after a few attempts, he secured a place in the office of Mr. Charles A. Platt, in whose organization he has been continuously excepting six months with the U. S. Shipping Board and six month with Trowbridge & Ackerman.
All of Mr. Lewis’ work shows an appreciation of architectural character as well as a knowledge of architectural design.”


I first saw Lewis’s work in Drafting Room Practice by Eugene Clute (Pencil Points Press 1928). I found an old copy in a used book store years ago. There was no biographical information, but they reproduced a number of wonderful architectural detail studies done in charcoal.





The only other story I found concerning Lewis’s work is in The President as Architect: Franklin D. Roosevelt's Top Cottage, By John G. Waite Associates, Architects. In 1938 President Roosevelt sketched out the design for a “cottage” on his Hyde Park property north of New York City. Lewis, who did regular work for Henry J. Toombs, FDR’s favorite architect, was brought on to do a couple pencil renderings for a publicity brochure. Being a “traditional” renderer familiar with traditional architecture, he fit in perfectly with FDR’s love of the old country style of building.




Here are a few additional images which show something of Lewis’s rendering process. His preliminary sketches are nice examples of value studies produced by all artists of the time. The preliminary working out the light and dark areas ensures an image that presents the subject in a pleasing way. See my post on Gustave DorĂ© for more of the same, as well as all of my posts on composition.

Prelim sketch for Cadet Barracks at U S Military Academy
Finished rendering of Cadet Barracks at U S Military Academy

Prelim study for an aerial view of a Church

Prelim sketch for a rendering of a Church

Finished rendering of a Church

Unfinished Prelim study for a Church
______________________________


The following images are all of the Schell Lewis renderings that I could find on the internet. They are arranged in roughly chronological order. Comments are included as I felt the need.

1088 Park Avenue New York City, 1924

This and the next 6 renderings are nice examples of subtle value manipulation used to enliven otherwise dull forms.

Apartment Block in New York City, 1926

Proposed Development at Warm Springs, Georgia, 1926

111 John Street, New York City, 1927

15 East 39th Street New York City, 1928

1441 Broadway, New York City, 1929

Bronx County Jail, New York City, 1931
_________________________

Proposed Chapel at Kent School, Kent, Connecticut  1929

The image above was the only interior rendering that I found.

Georgia Building, 1933

Chapin School in New York City, 1935

The following 4 renderings are from the 1939 World’s Fair, held in New York City. Both Hugh Ferriss and John Wenrich did illustrations for the fair.

Court of the States Building, Inner court collonnade & tower

Court of the States Building, Inner court

Court of the States Building, Spanish grouping

Court of the States Building, West court
___________________________

Band Building, 1947
Mallory Gymnasium, Rhodes College, 1949

Toronto City Hall proposal, 1955

Trezevant Hall, Rhodes College, 1959

Moore Moore Infirmary, Rhodes College, 1960

Proposal for Mahan Hall at West Point, 1967

Lewis seems to have preferred pencil throughout his career, but was clearly a master of ink as well, as shown in the last two images I found. The first is copied from the internet and is very low resolution. The second image (noted simply as "brick house") is scanned from Arthur L. Guptill's classic Rendering in Pen and Ink, and is detailed enough to show both the overall composition and the satisfying details.

Burrow Library, Rhodes College, 1951


So, what do I take away from all this?
Schell Lewis is inspiring because he blends the large, conceptual view with the rendering of crisp detail. “Fine” artists can often get away with a broad-brush splash of emotion or symbolism (the rest is commentary). Architects, on the other hand, are usually obsessed with the details: “God is in the details”. But both scales of view are necessary.
The architectural illustrator must needs do both. Yet, it is unusual to find someone who can mix the two extremes so seamlessly as Schell Lewis did.